| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| chucker |
|
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 68 Member No.: 106 Joined: 8-October 04 |
I was wondering..
wot should we use for best performance and economy.. wots the recommended for Altezza? 96 or 98 octane? I'm not concerned about the price.. only k's per ltr.. how do we improve it? well, I hope we should start with a stock standard engine.. |
| FLEX |
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 11:53 AM
|
![]() Sleeper Group: VIP Member Posts: 1,585 Member No.: 34 Joined: 10-August 04 |
I used to use BP Ultimate (98 octane) and that was pretty dam good ! I used to always get around 620-640kms from a full tank easy.
Ever since I had my engine flush, cleaned and service with all the filters replaced and all - I was advise to do a switch over to Shell Optimax ... I only get around 580kms now ... "Supposely" Shell is better ... try and use the one brand of fuel if possible ... with the price nowadays - up to $1.20 its crazy .... ! -------------------- ![]() |
| Stephen |
|
![]() Altezza Club of Australia TRD Parts & Accessories Group: Director Posts: 4,620 Member No.: 35 Joined: 10-August 04 |
Likewise, I only use Shell Optimax.
-------------------- |
| bmalar |
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 03:21 PM
|
![]() Location: Brisbane, AU Group: VIP Member Posts: 769 Member No.: 73 Joined: 2-September 04 |
I also only use only Optimax, but if i get desperate I'll use BP ultimate.
-------------------- Brisbane
2008 ISF & 2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600 K5 |
| Flyboy69 |
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 05:36 PM
|
![]() "Gold Club" Member Group: VIP Member Posts: 589 Member No.: 45 Joined: 14-August 04 |
Try running around with my Diff and see what sort of fuel usage you get. I wish I was getting 580km out of a tank. I proberly average about 480-500km. Over here 98 is about $1.28 at the moment
-------------------- |
| voiceinsideyou |
Posted: Oct 26 2004, 07:23 PM
|
![]() Stock Group: VIP Member Posts: 153 Member No.: 22 Joined: 6-August 04 |
Of course, comparing GXE10s to SXE10s will be useless - so it'd help if people made clear what they have!
I'd be lucky to get 500kms from my SXE10 with intake only mods, but I'm happy enough :-p -------------------- 99 Altezza RS200Z: C-west front kit, xenon conve, HKS intake + Apexi heatshield, FGK/Fujitsubo exhaust, TRD front and rear sways, Cusco adjustble platform suspension
|
| chucker |
|
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 68 Member No.: 106 Joined: 8-October 04 |
oops.. my bad..
I think we should state that too.. as I read somewhere, recommended fuel for
I've got SXE-10 and it does about 9kms/ltr [avg urban].. its a '99 (model) and its a stock standard as far as I know so, I think the fuel economy is pretty bad for me.. actually, I've tried both 96 and 98 octane.. 98 is pretty much give you more performance for less k's.. (like high 8s a ltr) and 96 is pretty good with more k's (low - mid 9s a ltr).. |
| RS200AT |
Posted: Oct 27 2004, 08:10 PM
|
|
Lowered Group: Std. Member Posts: 248 Member No.: 94 Joined: 26-September 04 |
GXE-10 have 10L larger tank capacity.
I can get 10km/L in mt RS200, but 9-9.5 is more common. |
| Twincams |
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 05:21 AM
|
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 110 Member No.: 96 Joined: 27-September 04 |
my RS200 is getting close to 11km/l...
i personally noted that using 98 and below fetches worse mileage than the 'claimed 100' octane by Caltex(it's called Platinum grade here in singapore) which i am using now for good. -------------------- |
| chucker |
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 08:27 AM
|
||
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 68 Member No.: 106 Joined: 8-October 04 |
we dont get 100 octane in NZ gas stations yet anyway, I think the main thing is that I've gotta reset my ECU. Then, I've gotta start using a single type of gas.. so, at least I can get 9.5kms per ltr.. |
||
| Alee79 |
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 02:50 PM
|
![]() Location: Sydney, AU Group: Std. Member Posts: 407 Member No.: 109 Joined: 14-October 04 |
100 octane? for real?
i use vortex from caltex all the time,because petrol card from work cant complain -------------------- 2000 IS200 Silver
|
| chucker |
|
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 68 Member No.: 106 Joined: 8-October 04 |
good for you man
wots the consumption for your IS200? is it sports model? |
| Alee79 |
Posted: Oct 28 2004, 04:42 PM
|
||
![]() Location: Sydney, AU Group: Std. Member Posts: 407 Member No.: 109 Joined: 14-October 04 |
2000 IS200 Sport,70 litres tank,i cant remember whats the fuel consumption on it..maybe some of our expert here can tell us -------------------- 2000 IS200 Silver
|
||
| Twincams |
Posted: Oct 29 2004, 05:53 AM
|
||
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 110 Member No.: 96 Joined: 27-September 04 |
well, it's 'claimed' and we don't have any hard facts to prove it... my apologies, it's specifically named the 'vortex platinum' here, and also the most expensive... $1.61 per litre -------------------- |
||
| arist |
Posted: Oct 29 2004, 08:27 AM
|
|
Soccer Mom Group: Std. Member Posts: 13 Member No.: 5 Joined: 5-August 04 |
I was talking to the owner of Turbo Vehicles ( there was some evidence of detonation) some time ago he and his company are well known in high performance vehicle circles and after dynoing my car he mentioned that the only Fuel that they had tested in NZ that had any Guts was Mobil 8000 , the rest were rubbish! ( i have no shares in Mobil!).
Ron |
| SenDog |
Posted: Mar 11 2005, 02:06 AM
|
![]() Custom Group: VIP Member Posts: 682 Member No.: 234 Joined: 16-February 05 |
I'm getting some relatively shockingly bad fuel economy, but then again I haven't calculated it yet, will do so from now on to see if it's just my imagination. I drive it normally, with a squirt now and then, and it seems to be chewing up petrol at an alarming rate. Could be I'm expecting it to be a super fuel efficient 2 litre. Will find out soon ....
Sport model, IS200. |
| aidan |
Posted: Mar 21 2005, 05:55 PM
|
|
Soccer Mom Group: Std. Member Posts: 10 Member No.: 265 Joined: 21-March 05 |
I find BP Ultimate 98 is fine, also have you fitted an aftermarket air filter system- such as an HKS, K&N etc (Repco ones are no good!) I wouldnt really know about non-turbo 3SGE fuel economy as i have a 3S-GTE turbo MR2, hope this helps.
|
| jasestu |
Posted: Dec 8 2005, 05:31 PM
|
||
![]() caffeinated... Group: VIP Member Posts: 1,402 Member No.: 90 Joined: 20-September 04 |
I've just put this post over on the UK forum to help up a poor Altezza owner who thinks NZ only has 91 and 96 octane fuel... Hopefully he can find his way here for futher enlightenment.
Edit: Maybe edwardch is already here? The original post on the UK forum was from back in June.... This post has been edited by jasestu on Dec 8 2005, 05:37 PM -------------------- |
||
| Nakamichi |
Posted: Jan 23 2006, 03:03 PM
|
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 65 Member No.: 568 Joined: 19-January 06 |
At the time I bought my car a few months back the Lexus website shown that the fuel type for IS200 to be 91RON. The questions are :
1 - Does it mean that the ECU of the IS200 is set for 91RON and the continuous use of regular unlead will not cause any damage to the engine ? 2 - If that's the case, will the use of 95 or 98 octanes improve the performance or mileage ? TIA -------------------- ![]() The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection |
| greeneyes |
Posted: Feb 4 2006, 08:26 PM
|
![]() Targa Master Group: Admin Posts: 5,442 Member No.: 1 Joined: 3-August 04 |
I am quite sure using 91 will not damage the engine.
The only difference the fuel rating makes is to the spark advance that the computer delivers. If the fuel is low octane then the engine will detonate under load, the knock sensor will tell the ECU and the ECU will retard the timing and stop the pinking. This will reduce the power output, particularly over 3000rpm So by upping the octane of the fuel you use you allow the engine to run more advance on the spark, and the engine revs better. If you're not using all that power or all those revs, it doesn't matter which octane you use. I use 96, occasionally 98 (especially trackday! -------------------- |
| Brian_J |
Posted: Feb 4 2006, 09:55 PM
|
![]() Sleeper Group: VIP Member Posts: 1,705 Member No.: 54 Joined: 18-August 04 |
apparently the computer on our computers are "learning" ones, so best to stick with one grade of fuel.
apparently 95 ron is the way to go for the GXE. in reality though, i really dont think it makes much of a differnece, i usually go with 95 ron at shell or caltex. recently i have gone bp ultimax of 98 ron and notice very marginal improvements (maybe its all in my head though) -------------------- 2001 IS200 6MT
![]() |
| Nakamichi |
Posted: Feb 7 2006, 09:14 AM
|
![]() Stock Group: Std. Member Posts: 65 Member No.: 568 Joined: 19-January 06 |
I've tried all three RON from Caltex but did not seem to find any different for rev up to 6000rpm as that's the most I went. I made very sure that each tank was filled up without much mix of the other, ie at least 67 litres of each RON was filled at a time. The feeling of 91RON seems to be more smoother & softer on the accelerator
-------------------- ![]() The Pursuit Of Audio Perfection |
| SenDog |
Posted: Feb 12 2006, 03:26 AM
|
![]() Custom Group: VIP Member Posts: 682 Member No.: 234 Joined: 16-February 05 |
I've tried regular as well as Optimax / 8000 / Ultimate and haven't noticed any difference. What I did notice was fuel economy improved markedly when revs are between 3000-4000 instead of 2500-3500 during normal driving.
|
| jasestu |
Posted: Feb 13 2006, 05:55 AM
|
![]() caffeinated... Group: VIP Member Posts: 1,402 Member No.: 90 Joined: 20-September 04 |
Drive above 3000?! Sweet, that's all the excuse I need.. 5th gear on the open road... 6th and I'll have to go 130-140 to be economic? Gunna love explaining that to the enforcers...
-------------------- |
| SenDog |
Posted: Feb 13 2006, 10:04 AM
|
![]() Custom Group: VIP Member Posts: 682 Member No.: 234 Joined: 16-February 05 |
I believe it's more to do with the throttle position, light throttle on these un-torquey engines at a slightly higher rpm would be more fuel efficient than heavier throttle at a lower rpm.
|
Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last » |
![]() ![]() ![]() |